REALZEUS έγραψε:Περί 40Ν6Ε:
The Russian platform retains access to over half a dozen missile types for increased versatility, including the hypersonic 48N6DM/48N6E3 with a 250km range and the 48N6E2 with a 200km range. The platform’s most distinguished munition, however, remains the 40N6E which retains a 400km engagement range and is capable of speeds of around Mach 14. The missile’s unique trajectory, ascending to extreme near space altitudes before descending towards its target, provide it with unparalleled over the horizon strike capabilities and allow it to neutralise targets near the limits of its range as low as 5 meters off the ground. This allows the S-400 to target low attitude aircraft at long distances in a way no other air defence system can due to the limitations of the Earth’s curvature on conventional surface to air munitions. China received its first confirmed deliveries of the 40N6E in April 2019, and the missiles provide a potential game changer in theatres from the Taiwan Strait to the East China Sea.
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/artic ... e-missiles
Το θεμα βεβαια ειναι το ρανταρ να εντοπισει τα αεροσκαφη πρωτα και να καταφερει να εγκλωβισει στελθ στοχους (και κατω απο ποιες προϋποθεσεις). Ειδικα τα επιγεια ρανταρ εχουν πολυ μικρη εμβελεια σε στοχους που κινουνται χαμηλα, εκτος κι αν εχεις ευνοϊκο αναγλυφο. Οι S-400 θα λειτουργουσαν τελεια σε ενα καλοκουρδισμενο δικτυο με awacs κλπ. Τωρα τι συμβατοτητα θα εχουν με τα αλλα συστηματα της τουρκιας ενας Αλλαχ ξερει.
SEAD με F35, F16 vs S400, TOR M2, PANTSIR εγω θα εβαζα τα λεφτα μου στα Φ35, αλλα κουβεντα να γινεται...